08 Apr 2012
by fromavine
in Inane ramblings
Tags: easter, peeps

You thought Peeping Toms were bad, check out the naughty lil Peeping Peep!
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
03 Apr 2012
by fromavine
in Inane ramblings
Tags: boats, history, hotels, Long Beach California, luxury hotels, luxury liners, ocean liners, queen mary, RMS Queen Mary, sailing, ships, titanic, titanic anniversary, titanic movie, vacation ideas
With the one-hundred-year anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic, and the re-release of the movie, Titanic, in 3D, I decided to experience a similar luxury liner, the Queen Mary, which is docked in Long Beach, CA! Above are some of my photos from the trip, but if you’d like to read more, my experience was documented in an article for Yahoo News (please click the Yahoo link to read). Yes, being aboard will make you feel like “King of the World,” and you’ll be hard pressed not to yell “Jack, I’m flying!” with your arms spread wide, or “Iceberg! Right ahead!” Unfortunately, you won’t find James Cameron, Kate Winslet, or Leonardo DiCaprio anywhere on board, but it’s fun to pretend!
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
25 Mar 2012
by fromavine
in Inane ramblings
Tags: author, Fiction, literary fiction, literature, novelist, publishing, starting a career, writer, writing, writing career

It is the middle of a carefree night as I write this, after one o’clock and the world sleeps. My dogs are softly snoring, and I hear no cars roaring by outside my window, but I cannot sleep, even in this external, blissful silence, because noise is rustling through my mind, running like wild paragraphs. There are words in my head, words that are forming into something. So here I am, at the computer, putting words on the screen. I’m not sure why I decided to write this essay, as if anyone would care about how I “became” a writer. Perhaps it is vanity? Maybe someone will read it? Maybe no one will. It doesn’t matter. I’m writing it because I want to.
I think it’s impossible to say one can “become” a writer. You either are, or you are not … although it might take some longer than others to realize it. I was one of those people. As I have said before (read “About Me“), I wrote my first “novel” in elementary school, but I never fashioned myself as a writer until much later. In high school, I wrote poetry and short stories for the creative writing magazine, along with articles for the yearbook. By the time college rolled around, I had written a few pieces for music magazines. I also started my first real novel, that which would become “From a Vine,” but I had no inclinations about “being” a writer. For me, writing was something I enjoyed and it came easy to me (but that does not mean it was without great practice and patience).
I also enjoyed acting, and nearly everyone told me that was not a viable career path. So I had two skills – writing and acting, which, of course, meant one thing – I wasn’t good at math. Luckily I was headed down a path that involved very little math skills! After taking the required Composition I class and getting high marks, the journalism department asked if I would consider their major. I did and it worked out nicely; however, I never completely saw myself as a journalist either.
I went far beyond news writing and ended up taking every writing course offered at the university. I learned everything from poetry writing to speech writing. If it needed to be written, I knew how to do it. I could write savvy business proposals, heat up debates with my speeches, and draw laughter or tears from my fiction. Still, because I was bull-headed and dense, I never gave much thought about “being” a writer. At this point, I had my heart set on some grandiose idea of being a publicist. That’s a story for another day, but I can tell you the ending – shy people don’t make outstanding publicists.
Anyway, as my college lessons progressed, and as I learned all about promotion and public relations, I devoured the novels and poetry of great writers, which taught me more than any course book ever could! I read the poetic and meaningful words of Toni Morrison, learned about the Gonzo stylings of Hunter S. Thompson, reveled in the plays of Tennessee Williams, and swooned over John Keats. From these wonderful beings, these fantastic, passionate artists, I learned how words could sing. I have always enjoyed the sound of words, the rhythm and the rhyme. Words resonate, and assimilate, and alliterate. I learned the different styles of many great writers, and slowly, I started to create my own style. It was much like Michael Jackson learning dance from Fred Astaire and James Brown, and turning it all around, upside down, evaluating and contemplating, and then creating his own steps. To be a great artist, one must first learn from the masters who have come before!
People always ask me for writing advice, and I always say the same thing – read good writing. That makes all the difference. If one wants to be a great chef, learn from a great chef. (Never learn cooking from me, unless you like burned brownies.) It is important to know the ingredients to make a cake, then create your own recipes. Learn from those you wish to emulate, then smash it like a glass vase, pick up the pieces, and arrange them in your own way.
All of these ideas were coming to me, but I was never consciously aware that the words of these artists were sticking to my ribs and soaking my brain. They slept within me like a lingering dream. Every time I sat down to write, they whispered to me like ghosts. My novel, it kept coming to me too, in little spurts here and there. As I worked my way through college, I took a gig as a feature writer for an A-list celebrity’s magazine. It helped my writing skills, and I came to a conclusion – I did not want to be part of the celebrity B.S. machine (and this meant no offense to the celebrity in question). As I reached the end of my college career, who I was and who I wanted to “be” emerged more clearly like fog fading from a window. I could see through it now, and I knew what waited outside. I started handing in chapters from my novel to my professors. I let them (and my fellow students) give me feedback and advice. The novel really started to take shape, so much so, that by the time I graduated, I had a completed novel, meaning it had a beginning, middle, and ending.
I had learned a lot about writing, and the original chapters had evolved considerably. It was just dumb luck that I happened to know someone at a major publisher who copyedited the book (typos in a novel are just bad form). The novel went through many revisions over several years. The original, compared to what is in print, is nearly unrecognizable. While that publisher, ultimately, did not take on my book for publication, I finally understood one very important thing – I am a writer, and no publisher, or any other person or entity, can change that. Whenever someone asks, “What do you do?” I say, “I write.” You may not know my name. I do not drive a Ferrari. I do not live in a fancy mansion. I do not care if I ever sell one book (although it would help pay the bills and feed my Krispy Kreme donut addiction). The joy comes from the writing … just as it does right now as I write this essay. It doesn’t matter if no one reads it.
Obviously, I did end up publishing three books (and I hope I’ll be inspired to write more), but I know that I will always “be” a writer. I always have been. Writing, to me, is no different from breathing – until I’m dead, I’ll be doing it! And, in fact, if I look back on my life, I see it as a progression of type on a page. I kept typing, and eventually those random letters and words became a “thing.” Every click of type pushed me onwards. I typed without ever looking up from the computer screen. I saw nothing but type; all other options slowly faded, becoming visible only in my peripheral. I have no doubt that I’m doing what I’m meant to be doing. I’m write (I mean, “right”) where I’m meant to be … clickety clackety moving along down this fantastic blank page and seeing what I can create … and create again … just for the fun of it!
P.S. People have a strange misconception about writers (well, we are strange types). I certainly did not write this entire essay, as it reads now, in the middle of the night. Sure, I got up and wrote something, then I ate Cheetos, then I went to sleep, woke up, read it, edited it, switched things around, added bits, deleted bits, and kept doing this throughout the day until it said exactly what I wanted to say, the way I wanted to say it, to the best of my abilities. Writing is work. Lots of work. Hard work. No one sits down and writes a novel word for word without editing. If someone can do this, this person is God. I have yet to meet a writer who doesn’t suffer through every word, pondering, rewriting, never ever feeling completely satisfied with the final product. That’s writing.
Like this:
6 bloggers like this post.
23 Mar 2012
by fromavine
in My book news & promo
Tags: death, death of lovers, Harry Houdini, love stories, magic, magician, mystical lovers, reincarnated lovers, reincarnation, Romance, soulmates, twin flames

The cover of the novel "Rosabelle, believe" by Michelle Cushing
Small excerpt from chapter 1 of Rosabelle, believe:
Eric Pilot’s belief in magic started as a little boy with the word buttermilk. Not something normally associated with anything mystical, but that word taught him a lesson about life and about love too. Death, he learned, was like a magic trick, even if it is a secret that only the magician and his assistant understand. The great magician Harry Houdini once said that magic was never a mystery to him; it came naturally, simply, as if he had done it all before, a past life maybe. Death – it was no different, just a simple sleight of hand trick. For some people it was like that. Eric was one of those people.
His mind was sharp as lightning, and he could spot a ruse like a detective on a case. As the passenger train rumbled through the Ozark Mountains in the early morning, Eric shuffled a deck of cards and admired the leaves turning red, yellow, and orange. He thought it was like magic – one minute brand new and green, the next amber and wilted, but still vibrant, beautiful. His parents and grandparents were orange leaves. Some day they would be green again. He believed this completely. Death, remember, a simple illusion.
His understanding of magic started on the day of his grandfather’s funeral many years ago. Grandma Pilot had found Eric on her bed, tearing a thread from the quilt she had been perpetually knitting for him since his birth. The seven-year-old had resolved himself not to go to the funeral. Out of protest, you see, because Grandpa Pilot had lied. He had promised not to die. Yet he was dead. Feeling like a lost deck of playing cards stuck deep in the back of a drawer, Eric had sat on his grandparents’ bed with no tears but with a flicker of rage in his eyes. If a tear had slipped out, no doubt it would have felt like melting wax. Outside it had been a cold winter, as it always was in Fairbanks, Alaska on his grandparents’ ranch. Eric had looked at the trees, sickly sticks for branches, weighing heavy with ice, a blanket of snow as far as he could see. To him, it did not look like a fluffy, puffy playground to build a snowman. It just looked cold. Barren. Endless. Leading nowhere. Grandma Pilot, a sturdy but stick-thin woman with long gray hair in a ponytail, had leaned in the doorway watching him pull at that piece of thread from the blanket. It had various patches, mostly shades of green, but the one of a biplane to represent his last name was his favorite.
“You’re going to pull that thread until you have a pile of loose yarn. You want that to happen?” she had said on that icy day, taking a seat beside him, patting his head.
“Grandpa lied.” The words in his mouth were sticky, oozing like hot tar.
“He didn’t lie, Eri,” she had said, calling him by his nickname. For a long while, the kids at his new school thought his name was Harry since “Eri” sounded that way. “Come spring, those trees will have green leaves again,” she had told him, pointing at the trees outside. “Remember what we talked about after your parents died?” Eric had looked into his grandmother’s eyes, eyes of blue, not a cold blue like the way the sky looked on that freezing winter Alaskan day, but a soft blue like a baby’s blanket, a crystal clear stream to carry away sorrow (and he had hoped it would not burden her, weigh her down with pain). Trusting, the rage within him subsided to a faint glimmer. She had gotten very close to him, whispered in his ear, “I’m going to tell you a secret, one that your grandfather and I share, and you’ll know Grandpa Pilot did not lie.”
What she had told Eric that day could be regarded by some as an old woman’s silly wishful thinking, and what happened later as a mere coincidence, but it was the match that lit a different type of fire in young Eric that stayed with him forever. Not only did Eric lose his fear of death, but he gained a longing that was hard for a young child to grasp. On that day, his grandmother swore that Eric’s eyes changed from pale brown to black as coal. His eyes became an endless night sky searching for a sun to light it, an eternal flame.
As a thirty-three-year-old man that same fire burned within him. It burned so hot, the believers say, that a strange flicker emanated from his gaze. Eric looked through the steam mist rising from the bottom of the train. Dawn. The sun looked like a great fire in the distance, warming the day, but a dark cloud hovered near it, promising rain up ahead. The cloud appeared endless but Eric could see the blue sky beyond it. A sun-fueled day. That was Eric’s destination.
(Copyright © 2010 Michelle Cushing, Mulberry Bark Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this book, or excerpts, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the Publisher, except where permitted by law.)
Buy Rosabelle, believe
(A novel about a man who believes he is the reincarnation of Harry Houdini and his quest to prove to his beloved that she is the reincarnation of Bess Houdini.)

Harry Houdini and Bess Houdini
Like this:
2 bloggers like this post.
09 Mar 2012
by fromavine
in Inane ramblings
Tags: corey haim, meaning of life

How would you answer this question – What is the meaning of life?
My sister and I wondered this very thing, so awhile back we began an ambitious project, compiling answers to this “simple” question, querying everyone from celebrities to physicists to our friends and family. Ultimately, the project never got off the ground, and none of the responses were ever published. I went on to publish a few novels, including Rosabelle, believe, and my sister’s career went in the same direction, releasing The Mask of Aubrey Clover.
Recently, while going over some of my old computer files, I came across the remnants of that long-forgotten “meaning of life” project, and one succinct answer caught my attention. It was a response from actor Corey Haim (The Lost Boys), who died two years ago on March 10.
This is Haim’s answer that we received via email:
“Live life to the fullest. When you do, you are happy, and being happy is the best thing in the world.”
Regardless of what one might think of Haim’s personal choices, one would have to agree that in a world obsessed with material pursuits, the search for happiness is a refreshing answer from someone who grew up in the spotlight.
In a way, the search for happiness was the sentiment each response we received was trying to convey. Perhaps the only variation is that we all define happiness differently, and perhaps, we all should begin defining it outside the realm of fame, power, and wealth. For me, those three things do not bring “meaning” to life, therefore should never be associated with happiness. While they can bring a certain amount of joy (if I won the lottery, I’d be overjoyed!), those things will never add “meaning” to life and can never add the overall sense of peace that true happiness brings to life.
Like this:
One blogger likes this post.
23 Oct 2011
by fromavine
in Inane ramblings
Tags: Hunter Thompson, Johnny Depp, Rum Diary

I’ve noticed, after reading some of the reviews for the upcoming film, The Rum Diary, that it is repeatedly called Johnny Depp’s “passion project,” as if this word “passion” for a creative project is a bad thing. With an eye roll and a humored sigh, the critics expound, “Oh, that’s just Johnny’s passion project, so let’s humor him and see how it does.” Well, I say, what the hell is wrong with passion? Is passion something to be scoffed at, ignored, shamed? Oh, good lord, Johnny Depp, run and hide, man, you’ve made something that you care about! Have you no shame?
Good grief, what have we bloody become? Passionless idiots without any deep emotions for anything? Do not cry in public. Do not laugh too loudly. Do not hold your lover’s hand. Don’t get angry at injustice! Feel nothing, because feeling is weak. Weak, they say! Weakness! Never let your guard down, and to be on the safe side (which is much better, you cowards), it is easier to feel nothing! Thirst for life? There is no such thing!
Have we really become this apathetic (and pathetic)? This listless and dead? Lifeless clay without heart.
It fascinates me that passion for a creative project should ever be deemed silly. The last time I checked, passion was a key ingredient for art (but, sadly, art is nearly in the coffin too). Johnny Depp apparently really, really, really loved his friend Hunter S. Thompson, and he made this movie as much a tribute to that friendship, as he did an honest film. That should not be taken lightly, regardless of your opinion of Depp, Thompson, or the movie itself. It should be applauded in a world depraved of emotion.
Passion has become a foreigner in our own land. We put up borders, hold up our hands, and laugh, “Go away! We need none of that garbage here.” But, we need it. Oh, good God, we need it. Passion IS life. The universe was not lackadaisical in its creation. It was passionate. It wept, it laughed, it loved … deeply. As we should. Feel something, dammit!
Passion projects? We shouldn’t take those as seriously? Those are the only ones I want to hear about.
Like this:
One blogger likes this post.
30 Sep 2011
by fromavine
in Inane ramblings
Tags: Conrad Murray, Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson death, Substance dependence

There seems to be a lot of discussion about Michael Jackson’s own role in his death. He’s a drug addict, they say, so it’s his own fault. Well, those people are missing a very big point here. Michael Jackson is not on trial. This court case is not about Michael Jackson’s culpability in his own death. This is about Dr. Conrad Murray’s role in Michael Jackson’s death. Period.
Are these people claiming that Dr. Feelgoods shouldn’t be held accountable for their actions? They are guilty of nothing? In my opinion, these types of “doctors” are worse than the drug dealers on the street. You expect those guys to be nefarious, but doctors are suppose to “do no harm.” We should be able to trust doctors. Would you trust Conrad Murray?
For me this whole “blame the victim” crap that they are throwing at Michael Jackson is based on the notion that people who take drugs (for whatever reason) are “bad people” and they get what’s coming to them. That’s heartless. Sure, if you engage in reckless behavior, there are consequences, but this whole thing is akin to blaming a rock climber for unknowingly buying a faulty rope and falling to his death. It was his own fault, because he enjoyed a dangerous sport and knew the risks? The rope maker is not in any way responsible for the person’s death? Really? Now, granted, I believe the rope maker would only be responsible if they knew the rope was faulty and sold it anyway, kind of like those tire makers a few years ago. Essentially, this is exactly what Conrad Murray did with Michael Jackson. He was Michael’s safety rope. Michael wasn’t an idiot, and I’m sure he knew what he was doing was risky. I’m not here to argue about Michael Jackson’s drug issues, but I do know that he was smart enough to realize he needed a doctor to watch over him. His mistake was trusting the wrong guy. No, I’m not condoning MJ’s use of propofol or any drugs, but I don’t think his drug use takes away from Conrad Murray’s culpability in his death. In my opinion, it makes Murray even more responsible. Not only did he violate his oath as a doctor by giving MJ these drugs, he violated MJ’s trust by walking out of the room and leaving him to die, knowing part of his role was to watch over Michael in the event that something did go wrong.
So, yes, Conrad Murray should be on trial. He is responsible for MJ’s death, and his actions should offend every decent human being on the planet.
(NOTE, Oct. 1: I also want to clarify that when I compared MJ’s use of propofol to a rock climber, I was in no way insinuating that Michael was engaging in something recreational or something that he “enjoyed.”)
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
Previous Older Entries